Evaluation of physical property and cytotoxicity of resin infiltrant based on a triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)

한국치위생학회
Min Ji-Hyun  ,  Ji-Yeon Roh1Ki-Rim Kim2*

Abstract

Objectives: The resin infiltration technique is a promising alternative therapy for arresting the early dental caries. However, there are very few reports on the safety and biocompatibility of this technique. We evaluated various properties of resin infiltrant (RI) based on a triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA).The water sorption (Wsp) and water solubility (Wsl) was assessed. Additionally, the cytotoxicity of RI against both animal and human fibroblast cell lines was investigated. Methods: The RI of the Icon®, the first product developed for resin infiltration, is mainly composed of TEGDMA in the resin matrix. The Wsp and Wsl for the RI were measured in accordance with ISO 4049 specifications. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for analyzing the polymerization before and after curing of RI. The cytotoxicity of RI against the mouse fibroblasts (L929) and human gingival fibroblasts (hTERT-hNOF) was evaluated using MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay and the data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Results: Wsp and Wsl of the RI specimens were 53.37 μg/mm3 and 10.6 μg/mm3, respectively. FTIR analysis revealed a slightly higher degree of curing with longer irradiation time. The degree of conversion for RI was high (80.9%) after 40 seconds of light curing. There was a significant decrease in the viability of L929 and hTERT-hNOF cells at RI extraction solution concentrations above 50%, respectively, compared to that in the negative control (p< 0.05). Conclusions: Even though the RI exhibited positive effect on the early prevention of dental caries, the clinicians should also consider the toxicity of RI on periodontal tissues.

Keyword



Introduction

Even though the severity of dental caries has decreased, it is still one of the most widespread oral health problems[1,2]. Dental caries occurs as a result of demineralization of the teeth due to acids made by oral bacteria. The earliest symptom of demineralization of smooth enamel surface is called ‘white spot lesion’. In the past, white spot lesions were left untreated till it developed into caries in the dentin. However, in contemporary dentistry, minimal invasive and alternative treatments are available to arrest the initial carious lesions, thereby preventing poor aesthetic and functional problems.

Resin infiltration is a micro-invasive treatment for enamel porosities, attributed primarily to demineralization. The light-cured low-viscosity resin penetrates and fills the dental pores through a capillary phenomenon[3]. Several in vivo as well as in vitro studies have reported that resin infiltration physically strengthened the demineralized teeth and enhanced the acid resistance[4-7].

Icon® (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) is the first product for resin infiltration. Resin infiltrant (RI) of the Icon® is composed mainly of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) in the resin matrix[8]. TEGDMA is a small-molecular-weight (286 g/mol-1), hydrophilic monomer, having low viscosity (0.05 Pa·s) and good flowability[9]. In reality, many resin monomers may remain ‘free’ after the light-induced polymerization and these unreacted molecules might disperse into the aqueous media causing adverse effects[10,11]. In aqueous environment, such as in an oral cavity, TEGDMA is one of the main monomers eluted from polymerized composite resin, and has been found to exhibit cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in many cells[12-14]. However, little is known about the potential toxicological implications of TEGDMA and TEGDMA-containing products. Also, there have been few studies about safety and biocompatibility of the RI, and dental professionals were also found to have lower level of safety management behavior when using resin[15]. Therefore, to evaluate the reaction and safety associated with RI, we investigated the water sorption (Wsp) and water solubility (Wsl) of RI, and also measured its cytotoxicity in two different fibroblast cell lines.

Methods

1. Preparation of polymerized specimen

The Teflon mold (diameter: 6 mm, thickness: 2 mm) was placed on polyethylene film and sealed tightly. The RI (Icon®, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was filled in the Teflon mold, and light-cured according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Six specimens of RI, removed from the mold, were prepared according to this procedure.

2. Water sorption and solubility

The capacity (μg/mm3) of Wsp and Wsl of the RI specimen was performed in accordance with ISO 4049 (ISO 4049: 2009)[16,17]. Six RI specimens were placed in a desiccator, maintained at 37 °C for 24 h. They were weighed (accurate to 0.01 mg) (XS105, Mettler-toledo AG, Greifensee, Switzerland) until a constant mass (m1) was obtained. The diameter and thickness of the specimens were measured using a digital caliper (accurate to 0.01 mm) (Mitutoyo, Japan). These values were then used to calculate the volume (V) of all the samples (accurate to 0.01 mm3). Following these preliminary procedures, they were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 7 days. The specimens were later on removed from the water, dried by blotting all the surface water until free from visible moisture, and weighed again (m2). Finally, each disk was placed in a desiccator and weighed every day up to a constant dry mass (m3) is reached. The Wsp and Wsl were calculated using the following equations: Wsp = (m2− m3)/V, Wsl = (m1− m3)/V.

3. Degree of conversion (DC)

An analysis of the change in surface chemical composition, before (un-polymerized, 0 sec) and after 20 s and 40 s light-curing, was performed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; Vertex 70, Bruker, MA, USA) with attenuated total reflectance (ATR; ZnSe crystal, Bruker, MA, USA). For both background and the samples, 32 scans were recorded at 4 cm-1, resolution within 4,000~400 cm-1 wave number range. The peak height ratios of C=C (1,638 cm-1) to ester C=O (1,715 cm-1) stretching vibrations were normalized versus the corresponding ratios of the unset controls, and the resultant values were subtracted from 100 to calculate the DC%[18].

4. Extraction of specimen

The RI specimens were placed under UV light for 30 min, and then transferred to sterilized glass vials with cell culture medium, without serum. The volume of medium was calculated at ratio to 3 cm2/ml according to ISO 10993-12(2012)[19].

5. Cell culture

The mouse fibroblast cell line L929 was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 1.0% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 10.0% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 5.0% CO2 at 37 °C. Immortalized human gingival fibroblast cell line hTERT-hNOF was gently obtained from the Department of Oral Pathology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry (Seoul, Korea), and incubated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium/F-12 (DMEM/F-12 3 : 1) supplemented with 10.0% FBS and 1.0% antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco, BRL, USA) in 5.0% CO2 at 37 °C.

6. MTT assay

L929 and hTERT-hNOF cells were seeded at a density of 1 x 104 cells/well in 96-well plates and left overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The adhered cells were treated with extracted specimen (1:1) or dilutions of extracts with serum-free medium (1:2, 1:4, and 1:8) for 24 h. A sample having medium without any extracted specimen was used as the negative control (NC). Subsequently, the extracted specimens were removed and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution was added and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The media were removed and then DMSO was added into each well. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Epoch; BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The experiments were repeated five times and all results were expressed as percentage of negative control.

7. Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SD). As a result of the normality test on the results of data for cell viability, the normality was satisfied. Therefore, the mean differences for cell viability according to the concentration for extraction solution of RI were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and followed up with Tukey’s post-hoc test. All statistical analyzes were performed using the PASW 20.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) at α=0.05.

Results

1. Water sorption and solubility

To investigate properties about the safety and biocompatibility of material, we measured the capacity of the Wsp and Wsl of RI specimens. The mean values of Wsp and Wsl of six RI specimens were 53.37 ± 2.59 μg/mm3 and 10.6 ± 11.9 μg/mm3, respectively.

2. DC

The ATR-FTIR result is shown in <Fig. 1>. The black line corresponds to the un-polymerized resin. The red and blue lines show the results of polymerization for 20 s and 40 s, respectively. In the ATR-FTIR spectra, typical absorption peaks were observed at 2,956 cm−1 (C–H), 1720 cm−1 (C=O), 1,635 cm−1 (C=C), 1,250 cm−1 (C–O–C), and 1,152 cm−1 (C=O). The degree of conversion was 79.32 in 20 s curing and 80.99 in 40 s curing respectively.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/ksdh/images/N0220190202_image/Figure_ksdh_19_02_02_F1.jpg

Fig. 1. ATR-FTIR spectra of before (0 s) and after (20 s and 40 s) light-cured for RI.

3. Cytotoxicity and IC

We conducted MTT assay to confirm the biosafety of RI in oral application. According to the extraction percentage of RI specimens, the viability of both animal and human-based different fibroblasts was measured. In the 25.0% dilute extract solution of RI, the both cells were viable over 90.0% for 24 h. The cell viabilities of L929 and hTERT-hNOF were significantly decreased at the concentration above 50.0% of extraction solution of RI comparing with negative control, respectively (p < 0.05). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of L929 and hTERT-hNOF were 59.8% and 64.7% dilute extract solution of RI, respectively <Fig. 2>.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/ksdh/images/N0220190202_image/Figure_ksdh_19_02_02_F2.jpg

Fig. 2. Cytotoxicity of RI in L929 and hTERT-hNOF cells. According to the extraction percentage of RI specimens, the cell viability compared to negative control was measured with MTT assay in (A) L929 mouse fibroblasts and (B) hTERT-hNOF human fibroblasts. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 versus negative control. NC, negative control.

Discussion

Resin infiltration is an effective method for white spot lesion management. Previous studies have shown the therapeutic effect of infiltration technique over a range of 25.0% to 37.8%, depending on the age group and material[18]. Various infiltration methods have been developed and investigated for the prevention of dental caries. However, there are few studies on the safety of RI.

Previous studies had reported that Wsl, molecular chemistry, and size of the monomer could affect the release of un-polymerized resin[20,21]. Low-molecular-weight, low-viscosity, and highly reactive monomers, such as TEGDMA, have been optimized as an effective material for RI. TEGDMA is also commonly used as diluent of many resin-based dental composite, and accounts for majority of orally released compounds[22]. The lipophilic nature of this monomer facilitates its penetration into the cytosol and membrane lipids in mammalian cells[23]. Also, the by-products of TEGDMA, triethylene glycol and methacrylic acid, have been reported to control the growth of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus salivarius in oral environment[24]. It has been shown to penetrate cells and cause mitochondrial damage[25]. Due to such severe side effects, the current study focused on detailed characterization of the effects of this polymer material on the human body. Therefore, in this study, we examined Wsp, Wsl, cytotoxicity, and DC of RI for evaluating safety issues in relation to the RI.

A previous study showed that the Wsp of resin cement composed mainly of bisphenol A-glycidylmethacrylate (Bis-GMA) or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) for 7 days ranged from 12.65 to 22.16[26]. The values for Wsp of the previous study were lower than that of the RI of 53.37 ± 2.59 μg/mm3 of this study. The Wsp of RI was similar to that obtained by immersing the product of Clearfil SE Bond (SE) systems in distilled water for 28 days (59.32 ± 4.88)[27]. In addition, the Wsl of resin cement for 7 days ranged from -1.11 to 2.51 in the previous study[25], however the result value of Wsl of RI (10.6 ± 11.9 μg / mm3) was higher than that in this study.

DC may be influenced by the nature of polymer and curing time, and the Wsp and Wsl of RI may further facilitate cytotoxicity. As the DC increases, the amount of monomer converted to polymer also increases. The properties of the polymer may affect the amount of residual monomer and might release monomers into the oral environment, depending on its solubility. Elution of monomers from polymer-based materials may affect the biocompatibility in clinical circumstances, as was clearly seen in the higher water sorption and solubility of RI compared to other composite resins. Previously, the range of DCs of resins ranged 55.0% to 75.0%, and the results of this study showed that RI showed high DC of 80.9% for 40 seconds of light curing[28].

Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of monomers such as Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, and HEMA have been demonstrated in various cell types in vitro. Adverse effect of methacrylate monomers have been shown even at sub-toxic concentrations[29]. The current investigation was undertaken to determine the relationship between the release tendency and its cytotoxicity. We used two cell lines for this study; one was the mouse fibroblast cell line L929, suggested as biocompatibility standard for medical devices and the other was human fibroblast cell line hTERT-hNOF, to mimic oral environment. The IC50 values of L929 and hTERT-hNOF were 59.8% and 64.7% dilute extract solution of RI, respectively. The extraction ratio of RI material (3 cm2/ml) was evaluated according to the standard for biocompatibility testing of medical devices and was found to be much higher than that applicable in the porous teeth. Due to unfilled resin composition, curing time was not correlated dramatically to its degree of conversion. However, the degrees of conversion were slightly lower than other results. Earlier studies have shown that most polymerization reactions of dental resin were affected by environmental oxygen, which is supposed to be a powerful inhibitor of polymerization reaction, involving free radical-producing resins[30]. The oxygen binds to free radicals on the surface of the resin and forms unreactive peroxy radical, which could retard or even terminate polymerization. So, it results in a weakly polymerized resin surface, its thickness varying from 4 to 60 μm[31]. The result of DC also depends on monomer filler size and loading. The filler could provide a diffusion barrier to oxygen. On the other hand, rapidly mass-produced free radicals, as in light curing, favors surface setting and reduces the extent of oxygen-related inhibition[8]. In case of unfilled resin such as RI or bonding agent, oxygen inhibition layer and its consequences may be considered more significant, releasing unreacted monomer and causing cytotoxicity that need to be investigated. Since this study is in vitro study, it is difficult to apply the results obtained in this study to the actual oral cavity. It is also difficult to compare the results obtained in this study with previous studies due to the lack of previous studies on the toxicity of RI. In the future, however, physical evaluation that may occur due to polymerization shrinkage due to high DC of RI is considered necessary, and the toxicity of RI should be also assessed by various ways in oral-related cell lines.

Conclusions

Although there have been many previous reports that RI has been shown to prevent the progression of early dental caries, there is little evaluation of toxicity of RI. Therefore, the present study was to evaluate the safety and biocompatibility of the resin infiltrant. The Wsp and Wsl for RI, the cytotoxicity of RI in both animal and human fibroblast cell lines were investigated. The following results were obtained.

1. The Wsp and Wsl were about 53.37 μg/mm3 and 10.6 μg/mm3, respectively. The values for Wsp and Wsl of the RI were higher than that of resin products used in the previous studies, respectively.

2. The longer the irradiation time, the more polymerization was confirmed in the FTIR analysis. The degree of conversion for RI was high of 80.99% for 40 s of light curing.

3. The cell viabilities of L929 and hTERT-hNOF were significantly decreased at the concentration above 50% of extraction solution of RI comparing with the negative control, respectively (p < 0.05).

In conclusion, it should be noted that despite the good effect of TEDGMA-based RI on early prevention of dental caries, the dentist should consider its toxicity correlated to its composition.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

1 Thompson VP, Kaim JM. Nonsurgical treatment of incipient and hidden caries. Dent Clin North Am 2005;49:905-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.003  

2 Fisher J, Click M. A new model for caries classification and management: the FDI World Dental Federation caries matrix. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:546-51. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0216  

3 Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Cölfen H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J 2007;26:582-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.582  

4 Kielbassa AM, Muller J, Gernhardt CR. Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: a review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int 2009;40:663-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.972  

5 Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration--a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2009;40:713-8.  

6 Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Inhibition of caries progression by resin infiltration in situ. Caries Res 2010;44:47-54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275917  

7 Paris S, Schwendicke F, Seddig S, Müller WD, Dörfer C, Meyer-Lueckel H. Micro-hardness and mineral loss of enamel lesions after infiltration with various resins: influence of infiltrant composition and application frequency in vitro . J Dent 2013;41:543-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.006  

8 Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Eliades T. Setting characteristics of a resin infiltration system for incipient caries treatment. J Dent 2015;43:715-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.010  

9 Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:442-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00636.x  

10 Nalcaci A, Ulusoy N, Atakol O. Time-based elution of TEGDMA and BisGMA from resin composite cured with LED, QTH and high-intensity QTH lights. Oper Dent 2006;31:197-203. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-10  

11 Huang FM, Kuan YH, Lee SS, Chang YC. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of triethyleneglycol-dimethacrylate in macrophages involved in DNA damage and caspases activation. Environ Toxicol 2015;30:581-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.21935  

12 Eckhardt A, Gerstmayr N, Hiller KA, Bolay C, Waha C, Spagnuolo G, et al. TEGDMA-induced oxidative DNA damage and activation of ATM and MAP kinases. Biomaterials 2009;30:2006-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.045  

13 Eckhardt A, Müller P, Hiller KA, Krifka S, Bolay C, Spagnuolo G, et al. Influence of TEGDMA on the mammalian cell cycle in comparison with chemotherapeutic agents. Dent Mater 2010;26:232-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.005  

14 Spagnuolo G, Galler K, Schmalz G, Cosentino C, Rengo S, Schweikl H. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase amplifies TEGDMA-induced apoptosis in primary human pulp cells. J Dent Res 2004;83:703-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300909  

15 Yoon SU, Nam IS. Behaviors-based safety management of dental professionals on dental amalgam and resin. J Dent Hyg Sci 2013;13:97-104.  

16 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049:2000. Dentistry -- Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Geneva: ISO Publishing; 2009.  

17 Fonseca AS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PP, de Menezes LR, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LF. Effect of monomer type on the C=C degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater 2017;33:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.010  

18 Araújo GS, Sfalcin RA, Araújo TG, Alonso RC, Puppin-Rontani RM. Evaluation of polymerization characteristics and penetration into enamel caries lesions of experimental infiltrants. J Dent 2013;41:1014-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.019  

19 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-12:2012. Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials. Geneva:ISO Publishing; 2012.  

20  [20] Botsali MS, Kugöz A, Altinta SH, Ülker HE, Tanriver M, Kiliç S, et al. Residual HEMA and TEGDMA release and cytotoxicity evaluation of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and compomers cured with different light sources. Scientific World Journal 2014;28:2014:218295. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/218295 

21 Michelsen VB, Moe G, Skålevik R, Jensen E, Lygre H. Quantification of organic eluates from polymerized resin-based dental restorative materials by use of GC/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007;850:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.11.003  

22 Geurtsen-W, Leyhausen G. Chemical-biological interactions of the resin monomer triethyleneglycol-dimethacrylate (TEGDMA). J Dent Res 2001;80:2046-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800120401  

23 Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, Leibfritz D, Geurtsen W. Metabolic effects of dental resin components in vitro detected by NMR spectroscopy. J Dent Res 2001;80:869-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800030501  

24 Lin BA, Jaffer F, Duff MD, Tang YW, Santerre JP. Identifying enzyme activities within human saliva which are relevant to dental resin composite biodegradation. Biomaterials 2005;26:4259-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.001  

25 Lefeuvre M, Amjaad W, Goldberg M, Stanislawski L. TEGDMA induces mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress in human gingival fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:5130-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.014  

26 Petropoulou A, Vrochari AD, Hellwig E, Stampf S, Polydorou O. Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:674-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.002  

27 Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006;22:973-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020  

28 Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00020-8  

29 Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 2006;85:870-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501001  

30 Odian G. Principles of polymerization. 4th ed. Hoboken:Wiley-Interscience; 2004: 255-63.  

31 Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12:256-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80032-7